First-Line Treatment Of Cancer Research Articles

Case report: Treatment with Phesgo® in a patient receiving hemodialysis

IntroductionPatients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer have multiple therapeutic options. However, most are not studied in the renal replacement therapy (RRT) setting.Case reportWe report the use of Phesgo® (subcutaneous fixed-dose combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab) combined with exemestane as a first-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in a hemodialysis patient with multiple comorbidities. Partial response was attained, with disease progression after 8 months without evidence of significant toxicity.DiscussionsThis case report is, to our knowledge, the first published case documenting the use of Phesgo® in a hemodialysis patient. No new safety signs were seen, and activity was documented, adding support to the use of this drug combination in such a patient population.

Population pharmacokinetics of adebrelimab - Support of alternative flat dose regimen in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Adebrelimab, a novel anti-PD-L1 antibody, has been approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China as an intravenous infusion for use in combination with carboplatin and etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in 2023. A two-compartment model with empirical time-varying CL for adebrelimab was established based on data from 263 patients receiving body weight-based doses from two clinical studies. Significant covariate effects of baseline body weight, albumin levels, tumor size, neutrophil counts, and presence of anti-drug antibodieswere identified on CLof debrelimab, none of which were clinically significant or warranted dose adjustment. The degree of decrease in CL was higher in patients who responded to treatment with adebrelimab than in non-responders. Adebrelimab exposures (AUC, Ctrough, or Cmax) were not identified as a statistically significant factor related to efficacy or safety endpoint in the exposure-response analysis. Distribution of simulated exposure metrics from the flat dose regimen (1200 mg q3w) was similar to the marketed weight-based dosing regimen (20 mg/kg q3w), supporting the alternative flat dose regimen in the clinic.

Abstract PO2-05-14: Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers with low expression of hormone receptors: real world evidence from the French ESME cohort

Abstract Background: HER2-negative breast cancers expressing low (1-9 %) immunohistochemistry levels of hormone receptors (HR, estrogen and progesterone receptors), remain an uncertain category, being considered either as triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) or HR-positive (HR+) tumors across guidelines or approvals. The issues regarding this clinical subgroup are both prognostic, with the need of a better definition of their clinical outcome, as well as predictive. Methods: The ESME database is a French National cohort of all consecutive patients who initiated a first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from 2008 on, in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Patients with HER2-negative (0 to 2+, ISH negative) MBC and known estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) expression levels were selected. Primary objective was to evaluate crude overall survival (OS) in HER2-/HR-low (ER and PR 0-9 and not TNBC) MBC pts compared with those with TNBC and HR+ disease defined by ER and PR < 1%, and ER ± PR ≥ 10%, respectively. In these 3 populations, predefined secondary objectives were to evaluate PFS under first line chemotherapy (CT), to describe clinical characteristics and the distribution of genetic abnormalities identified at the time of MBC diagnosis. Results: Out of 30,459 patients in the ESME database initiating their MBC treatment between 01/2008 and 01/2021, 19109 patients (2113 TNBC; 228 HR-low; 16768 HR+) were eligible for this analysis. Median follow-up was 58.0 months (95%CI [56.6; 59.0]). Median OS were 15.7 months [15.0-16.8], 19.1 months [15.5-22.4] and 44.6 months [43.8-45.5] in the TNBC, HR-low and HR+ subgroups, respectively. The multivariable analysis adjusted on age at MBC diagnosis, pathological grade and subtype, metastatic-free interval, number and sites of metastases and HER2 status (0 vs. 1-2+), identified no significant OS difference between HR-low and TNBC subgroups (HR=0.95, 95%CI 0.79-1.14), while HR+ patients had a better OS than TNBC patients (reference) (HR=0.50, 95%CI 0.47-0.53). Of these 19109 pts, 8910 received first-line CT regimen (1960 TNBC; 195 HR-low; 6755 HR+): taxanes-based: 66.7%, anthracyclines-based: 32.9%, capecitabine: 18%. Median PFS under first line CT were 5.3 (5.1-5.6), 5.1 (4.1-6.2) and 10.2 months (9.9-10.6) for TNBC, HR-low and HR+ subgroups, respectively. In the multivariable analysis adjusted on the same variables, the HR-low subgroup had a statistically poorer PFS compared to TNBC (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49). On the other hand, the HR+ subgroup had a better PFS than the TNBC (HR=0.74, 95%CI [0.70; 0.78]). Baseline germline BRCA1 mutations (at MBC diagnosis) were present in 4.5% of the TNBC cases, 2.6% of the HR-low cases, and 0.4% of the HR+ cases. The distribution of germline BRCA2 mutations was more homogeneous between the three groups (0.9% of TNBC cases, 1.3% of HR-low cases and 1.1 % of HR+ cases). Conclusions: In this large cohort, patients with HER2-negative, HR-low MBC seem to share similar general prognosis, oncogenetic features and PFS under standard chemotherapy treatment with TNBC patients. Citation Format: Marie Alexandre, Ludovic Gauthier, Audrey Mailliez, Thibault DE LA MOTTE ROUGE, Thomas Bachelot, Monica Arnedos, Florence Dalenc, Etienne Brain, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Vincent Massard, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Marianne Leheurteur, Thierry Petit, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Lise Bosquet, Suzette Delaloge, William Jacot. Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers with low expression of hormone receptors: real world evidence from the French ESME cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-05-14.

Abstract PO3-06-11: Undated analyses from a Phase Ib open-label study of Pucotenlimab (HX008) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) therapy war preferred in China as the first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.73 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 19.37 months [1]. Pucotenlimab (HX008) is a novel humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody with an engineered Fc domain. Preliminary results from the phase 1b trial [2] have shown that HX008 combined with GP has a manageable safety profile and demonstrates promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with mTNBC. Here, we present the updated results from the long-term survival analysis. Methods: Eligible subjects were those who were treatment-naïve mTNBC patients and had measurable lesion. Participants received HX008 at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks in combination with chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin) for 6 cycles and maintained with HX008 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and safety, and the secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), PFS, and OS. Results: Between July 2019 and March 2020, a total of 31 pts were enrolled in this study. The median age of patients was 50 years (range 29–69). By the cut-off date (April 24th, 2023), the median follow-up period was 20.7 m (IQR: 12.2, 25.6). The confirmed ORR was consistent with the previously reported data and remains at 74.2% (95% CI: 55.4%, 88.1%). The median PFS was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.3, 9.3). The median DoR was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.0, 9.8). The OS was immature, with the result of 23.1 months (95% CI, 13.4, NE), while the 12-m, 24-m and 36-m OS rate was 77.4% (95%CI: 64.0%, 93.6%), 42.7% (95%CI: 28.0%, 65.3%), and 24.4% (95%CI: 11.3%, 52.7%), respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia (71.0%), leukopenia (45.2%), anemia (38.7%), and thrombocytopenia (32.3%). There was no treatment-related death and no new safety signals were identified. Conclusion: The combination therapy of HX008 plus GP demonstrates favorable clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in pts with mTNBC. The combination therapy led to a longer PFS and OS than GP therapy reported previously, regardless of PD-L1 status. The safety profile was consistent with the known toxic effects of each agent. In this updated analysis, no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT04750382

Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in patients previously treated with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab therapy: The stage 1 results of a single-arm, phase 2 prospective clinical trial.

It has been observed that the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer has improved significantly with HER2-targeted agents. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding first-line anti-HER2 treatment options for patients who have received adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Besides, there are no reliable markers that can predict the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatment in these patients. Patients who have received adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Pyrotinib plus albumin-bound paclitaxel were used as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The safety profile was also assessed. In order to explore predictive biomarkers using Olink technology, blood samples were collected dynamically. From December 2019 to August 2023, the first stage of the study involved 27 eligible patients. It has not yet reached the median PFS despite the median follow-up being 17.8 months. Efficacy evaluation showed that the ORR was 92.6%, and the DCR was 100%. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher included diarrhoea (29.6%), leukopenia (11.1%), neutropenia (25.9%), oral mucositis (3.7%), and hand-foot syndrome (3.7%). Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase receptor (RET) were proteins with significant relevance to PFS in these patients. This study demonstrates that pyrotinib plus albumin-bound paclitaxel as a first-line treatment regimen shows good efficacy and manageable safety for patients who have received adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Besides, a significant association was identified between the expression levels of TLR3 and RET and the PFS in patients.

The Role and Mechanism of IFITM1 in Developing Acquired Cisplatin Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Platinum-based chemotherapies, historically the cornerstone of first-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), face a major hurdle: the frequent emergence of chemoresistance, notably to cisplatin (CDDP). Current understanding of the mechanisms driving CDDP resistance in SCLC is incomplete. Notably, Interferon inducible transmembrane protein1 (IFITM1) has been identified as a key player in the distant metastasis of SCLC. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database revealed that IFITM1 expression is markedly elevated in tumor tissues as compared to that from adjacent normal tissues, correlating with a worse prognosis for patients with SCLC. Our research focused on investigating the role of IFITM1 in the acquisition of cisplatin resistance in SCLC. Further clinical sample analysis highlighted a significant increase in IFITM1 levels in SCLC tissues from cisplatin-resistant patients versus those were responsive to CCDP treatment, with similar trends observed in cisplatin-resistant SCLC cells. Crucially, overexpression of IFITM1 reduced the sensitivity of SCLC cells to cisplatin, while silencing IFITM1 enhanced chemosensitivity in cisplatin-resistant strains. Our in vivo studies further confirmed that silencing IFITM1 significantly boosted the efficacy of cisplatin in inhibiting growth of subcutaneous tumors of NCI-H466/CDDP cells (cisplatin-resistant SCLC cells) in a mouse model. Mechanistically, IFITM1 appears to foster cisplatin resistance through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. In summary, our findings suggest that targeting IFITM1, alongside cisplatin treatment, could offer a promising therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance and improve outcomes for SCLC patients.

Cost-effectiveness of Kang Ai injection plus chemotherapy vs. Shenqi Fuzheng injection plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Cost-effectiveness of Kang Ai injection plus chemotherapy vs. Shenqi Fuzheng injection plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A Clinical Analysis of Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatments Combined with Chemotherapy in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Real-world clinical experience of using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients has rarely been reported. In this study, we aimed to perform a retrospective multicenter clinical analysis of extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line therapy with anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Between November 2018 and March 2022, 72 extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy, according to the cancer center databases of Linkou, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals, were retrospectively included in the analysis. Twenty-one patients (29.2%) received atezolizumab and fifty-one (70.8%) received durvalumab. Objective response (OR) and disease control (DC) rates of 59.7% and 73.6%, respectively, were observed with first-line ICI plus chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.63 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.25–8.02), and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.07 months (95% CI, 15.12–17.0) in all study patients. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; >4) and a high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration (>260 UL) were identified as independent unfavorable factors associated with shorter OS in the multivariate analysis. Regarding safety, neutropenia was the most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (AE), but no treatment-related deaths occurred in the study patients. First-line anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy are effective and safe for male extensive-stage SCLC patients. Further therapeutic strategies may need to be developed for patients with unfavorable outcomes (e.g., baseline high NLR and serum LDH level).

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed. Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy. Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

Effects of tislelizumab on health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.

This study evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the RATIONALE-309 (NCT03924986) intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in a subgroup of patients with liver metastases. Patients were randomized 1:1 to tislelizumab + chemotherapy or placebo + chemotherapy. As the secondary endpoint, HRQoL was evaluated using seven selected scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ-H&N35). Of 263 randomized patients in the ITT population (tislelizumab + chemotherapy n = 131, placebo + chemotherapy n = 132), 43% had liver metastases (tislelizumab + chemotherapy n = 56; placebo + chemotherapy n = 57). No differences in change in selected scores on the QLQ-C30 from baseline to cycle 4 or cycle 8 were observed for the ITT or liver metastases subgroup. No differences in selected QLQ-H&N35 scores were observed between the arms from baseline to cycle 4. In the ITT population and the liver metastases subgroup, a greater reduction from baseline to cycle 8 was observed in the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm than the placebo + chemotherapy arm in QLQ-H&N35 pain score. At cycle 8 in the liver metastases subgroup, the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm experienced greater improvement in the QLQ-H&N35 senses problems score than the placebo + chemotherapy arm. Differences in time to deterioration between arms were not observed. The current findings, along with improved survival and favorable safety, suggests that tislelizumab + chemotherapy represents a potential first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.

[Organ preservation in locally advanced colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability-high after immunotherapy].

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has achieved exciting efficacy with high clinical complete response (cCR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and durable long-term effects. PD-1 checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy has been highly successful in microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) colorectal cancer and has been recommended as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer by domestic and international guidelines. Several studies have shown that immunotherapy can be a potentially curable treatment for MSI-H rectal cancer and has even shown promise in organ preservation in colon cancer. In this study, we first clarified the feasibility of the watch-and-wait strategy after PD-1 checkpoint blockade treatment by indirect and direct evidence. Then from the assessment tools (including digital rectal examination, endoscopy, radiology, and lymph node assessment), the viable assessment methods of cCR for immunotherapy and related difficulties are proposed. Finally, the medication choices of immunotherapy, the treatment regimen, and the follow-up strategy are further discussed. We hope that neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be appropriately applied in MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer so that more patients can achieve organ preservation.

First-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and nivolumab for metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer-the randomised METIMMOX trial.

We evaluated first-line treatment of metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer with short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with immune checkpoint blockade. Patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (the FLOX regimen; control group) or alternating two cycles each of FLOX and nivolumab (experimental group). Radiographic response assessment was done every eight weeks with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Cox proportional-hazards regression models estimated associations between PFS and relevant variables. A post hoc analysis explored C-reactive protein as signal of responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade. Eighty patients were randomised and 38 in each group received treatment. PFS was comparable-control group: median 9.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3-12.7); experimental group: median 9.2 months (95% CI, 4.5-15.0). The adjusted Cox model revealed that experimental-group subjects aged ≥60 had significantly lowered progression risk (p = 0.021) with hazard ratio 0.17 (95% CI, 0.04-0.76). Experimental-group patients with C-reactive protein <5.0 mg/L when starting nivolumab (n = 17) reached median PFS 15.8 months (95% CI, 7.8-23.7). One-sixth of experimental-group cases (all KRAS/BRAF-mutant) achieved complete response. The investigational regimen did not improve the primary outcome for the intention-to-treat population but might benefit small subgroups of patients with previously untreated, metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03388190 (02/01/2018).

Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Durvalumab plus etoposide-platinum (DEP) showed sustained overall survival improvements in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) compared to etoposide-platinum (EP), but adding tremelimumab to DEP (DTEP) did not significantly improve outcomes. A third-party payer perspective is taken here to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DTEP, DEP, and EP for ES-SCLC. The cost-effectiveness was evaluated by partitioning survival models into 3 mutually exclusive health states. In this model, clinical characteristics and outcomes were obtained from the CASPIAN. Model robustness was evaluated through 1-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Outcome measurements included costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, life-years, incremental net health benefit, and incremental net monetary benefit. The analysis was conducted with a 10-year lifetime horizon in a United States setting. Compared with EP, DEP, and DTEP were associated with an increment of 0.480 and 0.313 life-years, and an increment of 0.247 and 0.165 QALYs, as well as a $139,788 and $170,331 increase in cost per patient. The corresponding ICERs were $565,807/QALY and $1033,456/QALY, respectively. The incremental net health benefit and incremental net monetary benefit of DEP or DTEP were -0.685 QALYs and -$102,729, or -0.971 QALYs and -$145,608 at a willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, respectively. Compared with DTEP, DEP was dominated. DTEP and DEP were 100% unlikely to be cost-effective if the willingness to pay threshold was $150,000/QALY. DEP was cost-effective compared to EP when durvalumab was priced below $0.994/mg. Compared with EP, DEP, and DTEP were unlikely to be considered cost-effective across all subgroups. DEP and DTEP were not cost-effective options in the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC compared with EP, from the third-party payer perspective in the United States. Compared with DTEP, DEP was dominated.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6-8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing. 162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18-21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64-76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0-17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3-11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29-0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group. The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PurposeWe aimed to compare the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy (RT) plus systemic therapy (ST) with RT alone in patients with simple brain metastasis (BM) after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).MethodsThe patients were treated at a single center from January 2011 to January 2022. BM only without metastases to other organs was defined as simple BM. The eligible patients were divided into RT alone (monotherapy arm) and RT plus ST (combined therapy arm). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of extracranial progression. After 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, two groups were compared for extracranial progression-free survival (ePFS), PFS, overall survival (OS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS).Results133 patients were identified and 100 were analyzed (monotherapy arm: n = 50, combined therapy arm: n = 50). The ePFS of the combined therapy was significantly longer than that of the monotherapy, with a median ePFS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.6–19.8) in combined therapy and 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7–10.7) in monotherapy (P = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.057), OS (P = 0.309), or iPFS (P = 0.448). Multifactorial analysis showed that combined therapy was independently associated with better ePFS compared with monotherapy (HR = 0.617, P = 0.034); more than 5 BMs were associated with worse ePFS compared with 1–5 BMs (HR = 1.808, P = 0.012).ConclusionsCompared with RT alone, combined therapy improves ePFS in patients with simple BM after first-line treatment of LS-SCLC. Combined therapy and 1–5 BMs reduce the risk of extracranial recurrence.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Aim: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to evaluate the efficacy of first-line treatments for locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating first-line treatments for locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC patients. NMA was performed to estimate relative treatment effects on overall and progression-free survival between pembrolizumab+chemotherapy and other interventions. Results: NMA including eight trials showed that the relative efficacy of pembrolizumab+chemotherapy was statistically superior to that of other immunotherapy- or chemotherapy-based treatment regimens. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab+chemotherapy confers benefits in survival outcomes versus alternative interventions for the first-line treatment of locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC patients.

A single arm Phase I/II trial on the combination of carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel and avastin as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (TORG1424/OLCSG1402: CARNAVAL).

Bevacizumab with platinum doublet therapy including paclitaxel+carboplatin improves the survival of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, in a previous trial (CA031), paclitaxel+carboplatin led to Grade>3 neutropenia in a Japanese population. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel exhibits an improved toxicity profile. We evaluated the safety, dosage and response rate of the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel+carboplatin + bevacizumab combination in a Japanese population. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer were included. The dosage schedule was established in the Phase I trial as follows: 4-6cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve=6 on Day 1)+nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (100mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15)+bevacizumab (15mg/kg on Day 1), followed by maintenance therapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel+bevacizumab). The response rate and presence of adverse effects were evaluated in the Phase II trial. The overall response rate was 56.5% (90% confidence interval: 44.5-68.5), and 93% of patients (43/46) showed tumor shrinkage or maintained a stable disease course. The primary endpoint was achieved. At the median follow-up duration of 42months, the median overall survival was 18.9 (range: 10.5-32.4) months. The most frequently observed Grade≥3 adverse effects were neutropenia (72%), leukopenia (50%) and anemia (30%). All adverse effects were manageable and none resulted in patient death. In conclusion, the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination is favorable and well tolerated in Japanese patients as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract CT275: A phase 2, randomized, open-label study of onvansertib in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone for first-line treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) has been a standard first-line treatment for RAS-mutated mCRC patients for the last 2 decades. The prognosis of these patients remains poor. Onvansertib is an orally available, highly potent, and selective inhibitor of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), currently in clinical development. In a Phase 1b/2 study, onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated safety and promising efficacy in the second-line treatment of KRAS-mutated mCRC patients (NCT03829410). A subgroup analysis showed that patients not exposed to Bev (Bev-naïve) in the first-line setting had superior clinical benefit compared to Bev-exposed patients. Based on this data, we propose to investigate the combination of onvansertib with SoC (chemo + Bev) in the first-line treatment of RAS-mutated, Bev-naïve mCRC patients. Methods: This exploratory Phase 2, open-label, randomized study is designed to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 2 doses of onvansertib (20 mg and 30 mg) in combination with SoC (FOLFIRI + Bev or FOLFOX + Bev) versus SoC alone in patients with RAS-mutated metastatic and unresectable CRC in the first-line setting. Eligible participants must have histologically confirmed mCRC, KRAS or NRAS mutation, no previous systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, measurable disease as defined per RECIST v1.1. Exclusion criteria include patients with BRAF-V600 mutations or microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair, prior treatment with a VEGF inhibitor, previous oxaliplatin treatment within 12 months prior to randomization. The primary endpoint is objective response as determined according to RECIST v1.1 by an independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival and duration of response per independent central review. The study will enroll approximately 90 patients. Each patient will be randomized to be treated with onvansertib (20 mg or 30 mg) + SoC or SoC alone. The enrollment period for this study is approximately 12 months. Patients will be followed for overall survival for up to 1 year after the end of treatment. Trial is open and recruiting as of November 2023. This trial is registered as NCT06106308. Citation Format: Heinz-Josef Lenz, Benjamin Kuritzky, Anu Thummala, Stephan Kendall, Ravindranath Patel, Sreenivasa R. Chandana, Alisha H. Bent, Nancy Sherman, Ramanand Arun Subramanian, Fairooz Kabbinavar, Joel Randolph Hecht. A phase 2, randomized, open-label study of onvansertib in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone for first-line treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT275.

Predictors of Immunotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Immune-Related Toxicity.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proposed as the standard first-line and subsequent treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study analyzed whether patients with good lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) have a better response to ICIs and the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response in clinical practice. This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients with stage IV NSCLC between 2016 and 2021 were included in the study. Toxicity was assessed according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 2.0 and immuno-related criteria. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted. Degree of toxicity and response to treatment (based on treatment and histology) were assessed. LIPI and response were assessed. LIPI included dNLR (absolute neutrophil count/(white blood cell count - absolute neutrophil count)) ≥ 3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal. Patients were stratified into good (G), intermediate (I), and poor (P) prognostic groups. A total of 168 patients were included (130 men and 38 women, mean age 64.3 years). ICI use in the first- or second-line treatment was 65% and 35%, respectively. Fifteen (9%) patients showed complete response (CR), 50 (30%) showed partial response (PR), 39 (22%) had stable disease (SD), 45 (28%) had progressive disease (PD), and 19 (11%) were not evaluated (NE). Patients with good prognostic LIPI (dNLR < 3 and normal LDH levels) showed a better response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months in G, 6 months in I, and 2 months in P. Overall survival (OS) was 27 months in G, 8 months in I, and 3 months in P. One hundred fourteen patients died (56% G, 76% I, 93% P). Patients with adenocarcinoma were 116 (77 with irAEs G1-4 (13 CR, 31 PR, 21 SD, eight PD, and four NE)), and without were 39 (three PR, six SD, 21 PD, and nine NE). Fifty-two patients had squamous carcinoma (27 with irAEs G1-4 (two CR, 12 PR, nine SD, and four PD)), and 25 did not (four PR, three SD, 12 PD, and six NE)). IrAEs appearance was observed in longer PFS (19 vs. 2 months) and OS (27 vs. 4 months; P < 0.0001). LIPI was a positive predictor of response to ICI. The presence of irAEs is associated with a better immune response. In contrast, the absence of toxicity predicted a worse prognosis.

Study Design and Rationale for IFCT- 2203 TAXIO: A study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a first-line chemotherapy regimen without etoposide, combined with durvalumab, for patients with extensive disease Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BackgroundStudies have shown improvement in overall survival with anti-PD1/PD-L1 molecules in combination with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide as a first-line treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). However, first-line efficacy remains limited and well below that observed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Etoposide may have a detrimental effect on lymphocyte activation, which could explain the limited benefit of immunotherapy in the first line and the lack of benefit in the second line for patients previously exposed to high levels of etoposide. MethodsWe initiated a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study of a chemotherapy regimen with durvalumab, combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel for extensive disease SCLC. Eligible patients will receive durvalumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 67 patients will be enrolled in this study, with a 12-month enrollment period and 36-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is Overall Survival (OS) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are best response rate, OS, OS at 24- and 36 months, progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, quality of life and safety. ResultsThis study aims to establish the efficacy of durvalumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with extensive disease Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clinical trial registrationEU CT: 2023-504670-38-00.